Sunday, April 26, 2015

Obama’s Brother: ‘Barack is Dishonest, a Schemer & Frank Marshall Davis May Be His Real Father’

Obama’s Brother: ‘Barack is Dishonest, a Schemer & Frank Marshall Davis May Be His Real Father’

MALIK-OBAMA-in-2008-Africa-photo-for-WND-story-April-15-2014
Joel Gilbert, the man who produced the film Dreams from My Real Father, which suggested that Obama’s Communist mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, may be his real father, has just released a bombshell interview with Obama’s brother Malik.
The interview, which took place on April 10, 2015, is bound to stir up more suspicion about the true identity of the usurper-in-chief in the White House.
Malik told Gilbert, “Well, the way that he’s turned and become a different person with the family is the same way that I see him behaving politically. He says one thing and then he does another. He’s not been an honest man, as far as I’m concerned, in who he is and what he says and how he treats people.”
When asked how that made him feel as the oldest brother in the family, Malik said, “Disappointed, disappointed, used, used and also betrayed. In the beginning, I didn’t think that he was a schemer. His real character, his real personality, the real him, is coming out now.”
Malik also confirmed that other family members think the same way about Obama. He said though they put on a “good face,” they are disappointed, upset and angry.
Consider that the first time that Malik met Barack was in 1988, and that was only after Malik convinced Obama to come to Kenya.
Later on, both men were the “best man” at each other’s wedding.
The two began to speak about Barack Obama’s book, Dreams from My Father. Malik claims to have had an original manuscript and said the original title was Where My Father Lies Buried.
“He changed it to Claims of Inheritance, and then I think that’s when he finally changed it to what it is, Dreams of…,” he said. “And he felt like as a representative of his dad, his only elder brother, I should go through the book just to make sure that everything was OK. It was a tedious process and so I just did the best I could.”
When asked if the book was accurate or if there was a lot of embellishment, Malik said, “Well, some of it like my grandfather being detained and all that, I’m very close to my grandmother and I never heard that before, and some of the things weren’t correct especially what my sister had to say.”
Malik also said that he and his Aunt Zeituni made the journey to the US to attend the Inauguration, but did not feel like they were welcome nor were they treated well. However, not only was that the case then, but he went on to say, “Even up till now, it’s like that. If I need to see him, then I have to really make an effort and when I go, I do go, then I go in through the back door or at night. This last visit when I went my aunt died in Boston, I really was crushed and broken.”
When Zeituni died, Malik appealed to Obama for funds to help bury her.
“I told him that she’s our aunt, she’s your father’s sister, she loved you very much and we need to do something for her,” he told Gilbert. “We need around twenty thousand dollars and he said that was too much and that it seemed like she deserved what she got. And I was saying in my mind, ‘what kind of person is this?’ And I told him, ‘you say you’re your brother’s keeper, I don’t feel it, and I don’t see you living up to what you say.’ She had really been good to him when he came. I felt really sad that he would just abandon her like that. I just left. She was stuck there for a month. People were trying to raise money and we finally got her back.”
The conditions in Kenya, and Africa in general are pretty poor. Malik says that there is “extreme hardship, poverty.” He also points out their technology suffers as a result as their infrastructure is poor and they have no electricity. Yet, the man who claims to be his “brother’s keeper” (a completely twisted view of what the Bible speaks of) hasn’t listed a finger or provided anything for the village Malik lives in.
Not sensing any respect from Obama, Malik said it all has made him feel “hurt, crushed.”
“I don’t understand how somebody who claims to be a relative or a brother can behave the way that he’s behaving, be so cold and ruthless, and just turn his back on the people he said were his family,” he said.
Gilbert had sent a copy of his film to Malik to view. Obviously, I question how he viewed it with no electricity, but I’m sure there are areas, especially in government where electricity is readily available.
According to Malik, “There’s a great resemblance. I think Frank Marshall Davis and Barack, they look alike. Some kind of moles I see on his face and Frank, he has those too. There’s a resemblance.”
However, when he was asked if Obama resembled his father, Malik said, “Not really, I don’t. They talk, they say about the years, but no. No. Your movie definitely puts a lot of questions in my mind.”
But Malik says that he would be willing to provide DNA in order to verify whether or not there is a relation of Barack Hussein Obama to Barack Hussein Obama, Sr.
“I would be willing to do that. I don’t know how I’d deal with it, if it really came out that he really is a fraud or a con,” said Malik.
Gilbert said, “It might be the reason why he made such a big deal about you politically, but personally he doesn’t feel the bond.”
Malik agreed. “Yeah, I agree with that because it’s hard to understand how somebody can make such an about turn and make a big play about where he comes from and then once he gets what he gets, wants nothing to do with that place anymore. We need an explanation and if you can provide the explanation, it would be better for all of us so we won’t be hanging, hoping for nothing. That’s what I really feel for my people is ’cause they keep hoping. Maybe they’re hoping for nothing. Cause he doesn’t mention it any more where he comes from or who his relatives are. He doesn’t say any of those things any more. It’s really disappointing, Joel, but that’s life. We live with it and move on and we wait for the truth to come out.”
“”I’d like to see him be for real, not be so deceptive,” Malik said. “He should live up to his word and be the leader that we expected him to be,” he said. “If he truly is my father’s son, then he needs to behave in a way that if my father was back, was alive, he would be proud of him, because although my dad went through what he went through, he would never abandon his family.”
Well Malik, the problem is that Barack Hussein Obama is a narcissist. That’s why he will never be a good leader. It’s why he has become a tyrant. True leaders have the respect and love of the people they serve. Those that don’t believe they must use the heavy hand of government to force people to do what they want them to. This is Barack Obama.
While some of that makes me feel some sympathy towards Malik and his family, there are other aspects of his dealings that give me pause. You can check some of those aspects out by clicking here.
Courtesy of Freedom Outpost.

Don't forget to follow the D.C. Clothesline on Facebook and Twitter. PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.

Saturday, April 25, 2015

‘Use lots of lube & enter anus slowly’: Chicago schools teach anal sex to 5th graders

‘Use lots of lube & enter anus slowly’: Chicago schools teach anal sex to 5th graders

Published time: November 17, 2014 19:38
Edited time: November 18, 2014 05:24
Slide from Waters Elementary School's Sexual Health Education curriculum for Grade 5 (Screenshot/Waters Elementary)
Slide from Waters Elementary School's Sexual Health Education curriculum for Grade 5 (Screenshot/Waters Elementary)
Parents at an elite, magnet elementary school in Chicago were “horrified” when they saw the “obscene” sexual education materials their fifth graders would be learning. The curriculum included condom demonstrations and discussions of anal sex.
Andrew Jackson Language Academy (AJLA) hosted several parent workshops during report card pickup on Wednesday, including a meeting on Chicago Public Schools’ (CPS) sex ed curriculum. Parents were given a binder that included the materials and topics that would be discussed, including the benefits of female condoms for extending sex and increasing pleasure, the use of lubrication and how to insert condoms into the anus for anal sex.
Parents were notified of Wednesday's presentation in a letter from school principal Mathew Ditto. The letter said a CPS representative would be at the meeting where "we will share the lessons and information that will be taught to your child." CPS has said some of the lessons are even intended for children in kindergarten, DNAinfo reported.
The letter said the topics included personal safety, human reproduction and childbirth, puberty, abstinence and healthy relationships. Fourth-graders and above would also learn information about HIV/AIDS and sexually transmitted infections. Students in fifth grade and above would also learn about contraception and pregnancy prevention, and lessons would include a condom demonstration, the letter stated.

The chairwoman of the Local School Council, Angela Bryant, has two children who attend AJLA, which has 565 students. She called the way the information was to be presented to students "appalling," “obscene” and not age-appropriate.
"The curriculum is appalling," Bryant told DNAinfo. "The language to me was the most offensive part initially. Pop and lube, lube lube, and those kind of things. ... [It] serves to rob many of our children of their innocence."
"The language for me is very much concerning to me as a parent. The content goes beyond what I feel is age-appropriate for a fifth-grader," she added. Fifth graders are usually between 10 and 12 years old.
Another Chicago elementary school, Waters Elementary, posted the materials and slides that were included in the AJLA binder online. The presentation links to demonstration videos from Planned Parenthood, the Female Health Company and Teaching Sexual Health. The latter provides guidance on age appropriateness: “These videos should only be used for grades 8-12.” It also includes material called The 411 on Female Condoms that was developed by the Chicago Female Condom Campaign.

Slide from Waters Elementary School's Sexual Health Education curriculum for Grade 5 (Screenshot/Waters Elementary)
Slide from Waters Elementary School's Sexual Health Education curriculum for Grade 5 (Screenshot/Waters Elementary)
Bryant told DNAinfo she is in favor of health education that explains sex in an informative way, but said that the CPS handouts were composed "in a manner that actually is piquing curiosity about sexual pleasure."
In a statement Friday afternoon, CPS officials said that the objectionable material presented at AJLA was a mistake.
“The objectionable material presented at Andrew Jackson Language Academy this week is not and never was part of the student sexual education curriculum,” CPS spokesman Bill McCaffrey said in a statement. “It was mistakenly downloaded and included in the parent presentation, and we agree with parents it is not appropriate for elementary school students.”
“As part of our sexual health education policy approved by the Board of Education in 2013, Chicago Public Schools offers a comprehensive sexual education curriculum that is designed to ensure age-appropriate material and minimum instructional minutes for every grade level, consisting of family and sexual health education topics for K-12 students,” McCaffrey continued.

Only teachers were supposed to see the material, WBBM reported. School officials say they’re taking steps to make sure teacher resources and supplemental materials are kept separate from the curriculum.
CPS passed a new, comprehensive sex ed policy in February 2013. At the school board meeting when the curriculum passed, Dr. Stephanie Whyte, chief officer of student health and wellness at CPS, presented statistics showing that Cook County, Illinois ‒ where Chicago is located ‒ ranks first nationally for rates of gonorrhea and syphilis among all counties and second in Chlamydia, DNAinfo reported.
She said more than half of all CPS high-school students report having had sexual intercourse, 12 percent before the age of 13. More than a third reported not using a condom during their last sexual intercourse, and more than a quarter say they've never been taught about HIV.
In a 2013 press release, CPS officials said implementation of this type of comprehensive education policy "helps to reduce school-level incidents of sexual misconduct and harassment and positively impact rates of [sexually transmitted diseases] and unintended pregnancy among Chicago’s youth."

Slide from Waters Elementary School's Sexual Health Education curriculum for Grade 5 (Screenshot/Waters Elementary)
Slide from Waters Elementary School's Sexual Health Education curriculum for Grade 5 (Screenshot/Waters Elementary)
Many parents told WMAQ that, although they support sex education, the material went too far for elementary school students.
“Sexual awareness, OK ‒ but how to use a condom, and that it was going to be shown how, is a little bit extreme,” said parent Tamara Gear.
"It definitely gets to an inappropriate level, things I wouldn’t even discuss in my own personal life," AJLA parent Rachel Gigliotti said. "Sex with a condom, sex without a condom, sex with lube ‒ things that no sixth grader should ever be exposed to.”
“To tell my 5th-grader, who’s still into ‘Little House on the Prairie,’ that it’s OK to have safe anal sex ‒ I’m sorry. That’s just not appropriate,” another parent, Amy Miller, told WBBM.
Whyte plans to schedule a meeting with the AJLA staff to review the curriculum by grade. A community meeting will also be planned, McCaffrey said.

Critical Alert!!!!! From Anonymous 2

Critical Alert!!!!! From Anonymous 2

Friday, April 24, 2015 20:21
Get FREE private and secure Email and Messaging click now!
CRITICAL ALERT!!!!!
FROM ANONYMOUS 2
TO ALL AMERICAN PATRIOTS AND THOSE USA CITIZENS INTERESTED IN HELPING TO RID THE UNITED STATES AND THE WORLD OF THE CRIMINAL CABAL ILK…
WE HAVE BEEN RECEIVING ‘INTEL’ FROM RELIABLE SOURCES INSIDE THE AMERICAN CABAL MILITARY (ACTUAL SOLIDERS IN ALL LEVELS AND POSITIONS) PROMPTED BY THEIR CONCERNS REGARDING THE ‘JADE HELL-M 15’ ‘DRILL’ IN AMERICA.  
AMERICA’S SOLDIERS WERE UNAWARE THAT THEY WERE NOT SERVING THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC’S ARMY BUT HAVE BEEN ‘EMPLOYED’ BY THE ARMY OF THE UN/ NWO / NATO / CRIMINAL CABAL BANKSTERS.  THEY HAVE COME TO REALIZE THAT OUR NATION, THE UNITED STATES, DOES NOTHAVE A TRUE GOVERNMENT OR A MILITARY. 
THOSE IN THE ‘AMERICAN’ MILITARY HAVE COME TO REALIZE THAT THEY HAVE BEEN REPEATEDLY LIED TO BY THE CABAL USA MILITARY.  THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT HOW THEY HAVE COME TO RECOGNIZE THAT THEY ARE SERVING THE WRONG  ‘MASTERS’  AND THEY ARE, IN FACT, COMMITTING CRIMES ON BEHALF OF THE CABAL AND ARE NOT SERVING AMERICA AND HER PEOPLE IN ANY FORM WHATSOEVER. 
IN DISCUSSIONS ABOUT THE VARIOUS ASSIGNMENTS AND MISSIONS, THEY NOW UNDERSTAND THAT THE CABAL USES THE MILITARY AS ITS MERCENARY ARMY TO INCREASE THEIR PROFITS OFF DRUGS AND POPPY GROWING FIELDS, HUMAN SLAVERY, MURDER, INVADING SOVEREIGN NATIONS, RECRUITING, TRAINING AND UTILIZING TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS (AL-QAEDA, ISIS, HIZBALLAH, ETC.), PITTING CAUSES AND NATIONS AGAINST EACH OTHER, CONTRACTING FOR BIGGER AND BETTER WEAPONS FOR WAR, AND OTHER CRIMES. 
THEY ARE ANGRY ABOUT THE FOREIGN SOLIDERS BEING BROUGHT TO THE UNITED STATES, TRAINED AND EQUIPPED HERE, AND BEING PREPARED TO FIGHT ON AMERICAN SOIL.  OUR TROOPS NOW UNDERSTAND THE UNITED NATIONS IS CALLING THE SHOTS AND THEY DID NOT JOIN THE MILITARY TO PARTICIPATE IN CRIMES AGAINST THEOR OWN NATION AS WELL AS AGAINST OTHER NATIONS, NOR TO FIGHT ALONGSIDE FOREIGN TROOPS NOW HERE ON AMERICA’S SOIL TO DESTROY OUR NATION FROM WITHIN.
MUCH ANGER WAS EXPRESSED ABOUT THEIR FRIENDS HAVING LOST ARMS, LEGS, FEET AND HANDS, EYESIGHT AND OTHER INJURIES OF WAR AND THESE CONTINUE TO SUFFER WITH NO HELP FROM THE VA.  THE ‘GOVERNMENT’  REFUSES ADEQUATE TREATMENT WITH MANY EVEN HAVING TO WAIT MANY HOURS TO BE SEEN, IF NOT WEEKS OR MONTHS, ACCORDING TO THE ‘SEVERITY’ OF THEIR CONDITION AS DETERMINED BY THE VA.
THEY REPORT THAT THEIR PAY IS BELOW POVERTY LEVEL, AND THEY ARE LOSING THEIR HOMES AND VEHICLES. THE FORECLOSURE RATE IS VERY HIGH FOR HOMESTEADS OF MILITARY FAMILIES. MANY FIND THAT THEIR HOMES AND VEHICLES ARE REPOSSESSED WHILE THEY ARE IN ACTIVE DUTY OVERSEAS.
THESE TROOPS NOW UNDERSTAND THAT THERE WILL BE NO DIFFERENTIATION REGARDING SPARING THE SOLIDERS LOVED ONES AND THE AMERICAN PUBLIC.  THEY FEEL THAT THEY WILL BE KILLING EACH OTHERS LOVED ONES…. THE SOLDIERS ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT WHEN THE CABAL MILITARY GETS DONE WITH THEIR ORDERS TO KILL AMERICANS, INCLUDING THEIR LOVED ONES, THEY WILL ALSO BE EXECUTED (AS CANNON FODDER).   
INTEL WE ARE RECEIVING INDICATES THAT THE TROOPS ARE MORE THAN PISSED OFF AT EVERYTHING THE CABAL ‘GOVERNMENT’  AND THE USA ‘MIITARY’ IS PLANNING TO BRING DOWN ON OUR NATION DURING THIS ‘JADE HELL-M 15’ DRILL.  THEY ARE ANGRY ABOUT THE WAR CRIMES BEING COMMITTED AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, INCLUDING AGAINST THEMSELVES, THEIR FAMILIES AND FRIENDS.   AND THEY ARE VERY ANGRY THAT THE CABAL ‘GOVERNMENT’  IS NO LONGER ALLOWING VETERANS TO              POSSESS THEIR FIREARMS BUT REMOVING THEM UNDER THE GUISE OF BEING ‘UNSTABLE’  AND THUS ARE ‘THREATS’  AND ‘TERRORISTS’ IN AMERICA. 
THE CRIMINAL CABAL ‘GOVERNMENT’  IS COMMITTING HIGH CRIMES OF TREASON AGAINST THE NATION THROUGH THE CHEMTRAILS, HAARP, GMO FOODS, VACCINES LOADED WITH POISONS, AND COUNTLESS OTHER ATROCITIES BEING FORCED UPON THE PEOPLE.  THE MILITARY IS MORE FED UP THAN YOU CAN IMAGINE.
LAST SUMMER THE MILITIA NEVER SHOWED UP FOR ‘AMERICAN SPRING’ IN WASHINGTON, DC WHEN THEY DISCERNED THE ‘GOVERNMENT’  WAS GOING TO BARRICADE THEM IN AND THEN MOW THEM DOWN IF THEY HAD SHOWED UP AS THEY WERE BEING ENCOURAGED  TO DO BY HARRY RILEY. SINCE WHEN WOULD A VALID OPERATION, PURPORTED TO ARREST THE CRIMINALS IN WASH DC, ANNOUNCE TO THE CABAL ‘GOVERNMENT’ THE DAY, DATE AND TIME THEY PLANNED TO ARRIVE TO CONDUCT THE ARRESTS OF CONGRESS, ET AL????? 
NOW THE STORY IS THAT THE ‘GOVERNMENT’ PLANS TO TAKE DOWN AMERICAN TROOPS, SO THE TROOPS HAVE FORMULATED PLANS TO TAKE ‘JADE HELL-M’ AND ITS GOVERNMENT LEADERS DOWN FROM THE INSIDE OUT.
WE ARE ALSO RECEIVING INTEL THAT THERE ARE AT LEAST 25 MILLION COMMITTED MILITIA THROUGHOUT THE NATION  ALONG WITH SEVERAL MILLION SKILLED HUNTERS AND SHOOTERS THROUGHOUT AMERICA THAT WILL BE ASSISTING OUR TROOPS IN THIS ENDEAVOR.  THEY ARE REPORTING THAT THERE ARE WAY MORE OF US THAN THERE ARE OF ‘THEM’ – INCLUDING THE CABAL’S HIRED MERCENARIES.
THE CORPORATION MILITARY TRAITORS THAT WILL BE COMMANDING THIS TRAITORUS JADE HELL-M ‘DRILL’  MAY SHOULD CONSIDER PACKING IT UP AND FORGETTING THIS ‘DRILL’ WHILE YOU STILL CAN.   YOU WOULD BE WISE TO CANCEL YOUR PLANS TO TAKE OVER THIS NATION, TO IMPLEMENT MARTIAL LAW, AND TO HAUL OFF AND MURDER AMERICANS  IN COLD BLOOD IN YOUR DEATH CAMPS….. AS THESE PLANS MAY WELL BE TURNED BACK ON YOU!!!!
THE PENTA-CON, TOO, SHOULD CLOSE UP AND GO HOME, AS THEY ARE TAKING THEIR ORDERS FROM THE CRIMINAL CABAL BANKSTERS.  THOSE IN THE PENTA-CON WILL MEET THE SAME FATE AS WOULD ANY AMERICA SOLDIERONCE THEIR JOB IS DONE- – -THEIR MASTERS WILL HAVE THEM AND THEIR FAMILIES EXECUTED AS WELL AND LAUGH WHILE DOING IT.  HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF – YOU SHOULD KNOW THIS FROM YOUR WAR COLLEGE STUDIES. 
HEARING THE WORD NOW ON THE STREET IS ‘THANK GOD SOMEONE IS GOING TO PUT THESE TRAITORS IN THEIR OWN FEMA CAMPS!  THEY ARE THROUGH…!!’
TO ALL THE BLOGS, PLEASE COPY AND PASTE THIS INTEL REPORT TO YOUR BLOG TO NOTIFY ALL, ESPECIALLY MILITARY WIVES AND PARENTS OF OUR SOLDIERS, TO GET THE WORD OUT QUIETLY AND QUICKLY TO ALL SOLIDERS IN CASE ANY ARE UNAWARE OF THE PLAN TO TAKE OUT THE TRAITOROUS ‘LEADERS’ AND TO PARTICIPATE WITH THEIR FELLOW AMERICAN SOLDIERS AND PUT THIS TRAITOROUS JADE HELL-M PLAN TO BED PERMANENTLY.
WE WELCOME HEARING FROM THE SOLIDERS OR WIVES OF SOLIDERS TO POST COMMENTS AND/OR CONFIRM THAT WHAT WE HAVE BEEN TOLD IS THE TRUTH ON WHAT WE ARE REPORTING HERE… YOU WILLBE KEPT ANONYMOUS…..
TO:  ALL TRAITORS! THIS IS YOUR HEAD AFTER A…………..….. 300 WIN/MAG
SO GORDON DUFF SAYS IT IS A HOAX….WELL HERE IS 1 COMMENT AND THERE ARE MANY MORE SHOWING IT AIN’T NO HOAX… WE CHALLANGE GORDON TO RETRACK DOZENS OF VIDEO’S MADE OF SIMILAR GOVERNMENT MEETINGS INCLUDING ALL THE WALMARTS BEING SHUT DOWN…
Now this IS VERY interesting!!! NOW they are going to state the drill is a HOAX when their officers have been visiting various cities and counties, appearing before the councils, explaining what the drills will be about and answering their questions – all in their efforts to be extended the approval to be given ‘invitations’ by these cities and counties to perform these drills in their locations? HOW IS THAT? Army Lt. Col. Mark Lastoria, http://www.statesman.com/news/news/local/jade-helm-15-to-make-appearance-before-bastrop-cou/nkz4w/
Bobby McDonell Big Springs TX City Council Mbr Special Forces veteran Thomas Mead 
Army Special Operation Command spokesman Mark Lastoria..
and many more references to military meeting with communities is readily available if one will do their search
I have long suspected VT as being an agent for the criminal cabal ‘government’ – propaganda disinfo agents – consider carefully ANY ‘information’ they publish as you may succumb to yet more lies and deceit by the criminal cabal against the American people
NESARA- Restore America – Galactic News


Source: http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2015/04/critical-alert-from-anonymous-2.html

Electoral assistance

Credible and transparent elections are one of the key first steps for post-conflict societies to establish long lasting peace and security.
A UN Peacekeeper handing an election ballot to a woman at a polling station.
UN Photo/Staton Winter
A Liberian woman arrives at a polling station in Monrovia to vote in her country's presidential run-off election.
UN Peacekeeping assists election processes in many ways including through the provision of security, technical advice and logistical support.
Once the parties to a conflict agree to cease fighting, the holding of elections is often written into the peace agreement, and represents a major step in establishing a legitimate State. UN Peacekeeping operations are often mandated to play a direct role in this process.
In recent years, UN Peacekeeping has provided crucial technical and logistical assistance in milestone elections in many countries, including in the DR Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Afghanistan, Liberia and the Sudan.

The role of UN Peacekeeping

Over the years, the United Nations has provided several kinds of assistance to countries during elections:
  • technical assistance
  • election monitoring
  • organization and supervision of elections
Nowadays, as a general rule, the UN takes a supporting role in assisting the national electoral administration body of a country.Most of the work of UN Peacekeeping is focused on technical assistance to national authorities administering elections.

Technical assistance

Countries can request assistance to their national authorities in charge of administering elections. Our work in this area involves:
  • Security: UN uniformed personnel including UN Police and UN Military personnel carry out patrols to ensure voters can exercise their democratic right without fear of violence;
  • Technical advice on the reform of electoral laws and the establishment of procedures to ensure the vote is safeguarded;
  • Logistical support such as distribution of ballot materials;
  • Public information and voter education assistance through a variety of UN communication channels available to the field missions, including radio. 
For example, the referendum on the independence of South Sudan was held peacefully on schedule in January 2011, with the overwhelming majority, 98.83% of participants, voting for independence. The Sudanese authorities were responsible for the referendum process with the United Nations Mission in Sudan (UNMIS) working alongside the UN Development Programme (UNDP) and the Department of Political Affairs (DPA) to provide major support, including the printing and distribution of more than 10 million ballots as well as training for the staff of some 5,000 polling stations. The Mission leadership, and a high-level panel appointed by the UN Secretary-General, supported dialogue between key Sudanese parties in order to prevent conflict and build confidence in the process.

Election monitoring

While election observation by the UN is no longer common, the UN has in exceptional circumstances responded to requests to assess or even validate the integrity of an electoral process.
For example, in 2010 the Head of the peacekeeping operation in Côte D’Ivoire, UNOCI, was asked to certify the presidential elections.

Organization and supervision of elections

There were instances in the past when the UN was fully in charge of organizing the elections in a Member State. For example, UN Peacekeeping missions have played a crucial role in:
  • Cambodia 1992-1993: The United Nations Transitional Authority in Cambodia (UNTAC) oversaw the electoral campaign and registration of voters, as well as the elections which took place in May 1993. Over 4.2 million people, nearly 90 per cent of the registered voters, cast their ballots to elect a Constituent Assembly. The head of UNTAC declared the elections free and fair. In September 1993, the Constitution was proclaimed and a new government, led by two prime ministers, was inaugurated.
  • Timor-Leste 2001: The United Nations Transitional Administration in East Timor (UNTAET) organized elections in August 2001, two years after the people of East Timor voted to become an independent country. The elections were to elect an 88-member Constituent Assembly tasked with writing and adopting a new Constitution and establishing the framework for future elections and a transition to full independence. 

Recent elections supported by UN Peacekeeping

Click on the pins on the map to find out where we are assisting or have recently assisted in elections around the world.
View UN Peacekeeping electorial assistance in a larger map

Partnerships to ensure peaceful and credible elections

UN Peacekeeping works in partnership with other organizations, including other parts of the UN, to ensure credible and transparent elections. 
The electoral component of a peacekeeping mission works closely with the UN Electoral Assistance Division (EAD) of the Department of Political Affairs (DPA).
UNDP offers strategic assistance throughout the electoral cycle, from designing more effective systems to resolving disputes after the votes are counted.
All told, the UN provided electoral assistance to more than 100 countries during the past two decades.

Obama continues to cozy up to U.N. gun ban treaty

Obama continues to cozy up to U.N. gun ban treaty

By Michael F. Haverluck, OneNewsNow.com
President Barack Obama is continuing his push to disarm Americans as he arms himself with the United Nation's Arms Trade Treaty – a treaty the NRA says would undermine the constitutional protection under the Second Amendment that guarantees U.S. citizens the right to bear arms.
The National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) is alerting Americans of the commander-in-chief's latest attempt to disarm Americans and their fundamental right to protect themselves.
"When Barack Obama signed the U.N. gun ban treaty last year, he invited global gun banners to carve up our constitutional freedom," NRA-ILA's Dan Weber warns. "Now, Obama is using the full force of the international community to pressure our U.S. senators into replacing our Second Amendment rights with U.N.-style gun control."
Working with socialist-leaning European leaders this month to spur an international movement empowering governments to disarm citizens, Obama is looking to join a global push for gun control.
"Earlier this year, Obama conspired with the European Union to issue an international declaration demanding immediate 'disarmament and arms control' under the United Nations gun ban treaty," Weber reports. "Obama and his anti-gun European allies vowed to ensure every nation's 'entry into force of the Arms Trade Treaty.'"
Obama bypassing senators … again?
After seeing potential obstacles ahead, Obama has again set his eyes on fast-tracking his agenda by reportedly bypassing the checks and balances by which he vowed to uphold as president.
"And that's not all," Weber continued. "In a meeting of non-governmental organizations and U.N. officials, Obama's Assistant Secretary of State declared that the White House is 'already implementing the treaty' without Senate ratification!"
NRA-ILA executive director Chris Cox warns Americans that this latest straight-arm by the president to push past the democratic process once again is no ruse.
"Make no mistake," Cox exhorts Americans. "If the U.S. Senate fails to stand strong against the U.N. gun ban treaty and fight back against every backdoor attempt by the Obama administration to implement it, we will lose our gun rights and effectively lose our national sovereignty."
Weber explains why he considers this latest move by the White House so dangerous to Americans who understand the importance of the fundamental right to bear arms and the dire nature of the government's move to render its citizens defenseless.
"That's because the U.N. gun ban treaty would establish a permanent international gun control bureaucracy within the U.N. Office for Disarmament Affairs to oversee and influence gun policy in all nations," Weber points out.
In addition to stripping away Americans' right to protect themselves, he believes the international treaty would invade the privacy of the remaining citizens who manage to still possess firearms.
"It would also set the stage for an international gun registration system which in turn could pave the way for the eventual banning and confiscation of firearms," Weber informs. "In fact, under the treaty's guidelines, the United States government could be required, as a condition of importing firearms from other countries, to provide the exporting countries with the most sensitive, personal information of American gun owners."
Point of no return?
Cox insists that if Americans stand blindly by as Obama attempts this move, they will see their constitutional rights swept out from under their feet … again.
"Gun owners and freedom-loving Americans need to remind their senators that they work for us, NOT Barack Obama and NOT international gun ban zealots," says Cox. "And the best way we can do that is by signing NRA's official petition to the U.S. Senate."
According to Cox, the NRA has battled for more than 15 years against the adoption of the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty so that it won't trample the Bill of Rights that have been upheld in America for centuries.
"In all of that time [the past 15 years], we've never faced a president as dangerous as Barack Obama who is willing to lock arms with international tyrants against you, me and our constitutional freedom," the NRA-ILA spokesman contends.
Cox insists that Americans' national sovereignty and Second Amendment freedom have never been more in jeopardy than now. He stresses that if the Senate isn't persuaded to stand up to the president against his push for the U.N. treaty, America could hit the point of no return.
"If the U.N. gun ban treaty is ever ratified into law, or implemented by Obama behind the scenes, we may never get a second chance to save the Second Amendment," Cox concludes.
----
Copyright OneNewsNow.com. Reprinted with permission.

OBAMA SET TO SIGN UN ARMS TREATY ALLOWING IRAN TO DISARM AMERICANS!

OBAMA SET TO SIGN UN ARMS TREATY ALLOWING IRAN TO DISARM AMERICANS!

Image Just when you thought the Obama administration couldn't get any worse, now Barack Obama is poised to sign an International UN Treaty that potentially would allow Iran to disarm Americans!

Crazy? Yes. But soon to be International Law supported by the posing President of the United States? Quite possible.

To add insult to injury, as reported in WND.com, Iran, according to an high level inside source, has 40,000 terror agents in the U.S., Central and South America set to wreak havoc on U.S. soil.

So, what red-blooded American President could possibly sign a UN treaty giving the home addresses of U.S. gun owners to the Mullahs of Iran who are set on destroying US?

If he signs this one, it may give new meaning to the phrase "Red-blooded."

Conducting Talk Show interviews on this topic is former congressman Bob Beauprez (R) Colorado.

In response to this outrageous pending act of potential treason, Beauprez stated, "I am hard pressed to understand why any freedom loving nation would sign a treaty with the UN which has become the most anti-American, anti-Freedom, anti-transparency organization in the entire world. And their largest voting block is the 57 members of the organisation with the Islamic Cooperation. Why in the world should America or any pro-democracy, pro-freedom nation cede their sovereignty to such a corrupt, anti-freedom organization as the UN has become. The UN has really become a farce. It’s high time the US wakes up and realizes the UN is dedicated to our destruction. We need to pull the plug on the UN, the sooner the better.”

Bob also reminds us that the Bush administration refused to participate in the constitution-usurping talks but that Obama reversed the Bus decision in 2009, agreeing to take participate in the global talks. Bob warns that such a treaty could forbid the U.S. from helping Israel or Taiwan.


THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE MAY BE HELPFUL WITH SHOW PREP:

Fox News/7-11-12

UN arms treaty could put U.S. gun owners in foreign sights, say critics

A treaty being hammered out this month at the United Nations -- with Iran playing a key role -- could expose the records of America's gun owners to foreign governments -- and, critics warn, eventually put the Second Amendment on global trial.

International talks in New York are going on throughout July on the final wording of the so-called Arms Trade Treaty, which supporters such as Amnesty International USA say would rein in unregulated weapons that kill an estimated 1,500 people daily around the world. But critics, including the National Rifle Association’s Wayne LaPierre, warn the treaty would mark a major step toward the eventual erosion of the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment gun-ownership rights.

Americans “just don’t want the UN to be acting as a global nanny with a global permission slip stating whether they can own a gun or not,” LaPierre said. “It cheapens our rights as American citizens, and weakens our sovereignty,” he warned in an exclusive interview with FoxNews.com from the halls of the UN negotiating chambers.

The world body has already been criticized for appointing Iran to a key role in the talks, even as Tehran stands accused by the UN of arming Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's bloody crackdown on rebels. The Obama administration in 2009 reversed Bush administration policy by agreeing to take part in the talks. But in another exclusive interview with FoxNews.com, the top government official on the issue under President Bush says he’s seen nothing new to convince him the U.S. should be at the table today.

While the treaty’s details are still under discussion, the document could straitjacket U.S. foreign policy to the point where Washington could be restricted from helping arm friends such as Taiwan and Israel, said Greg Suchan, Deputy Assistant Secretary in the State Department’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs from 2000 to 2007.

Suchan also highlighted ongoing concern that the treaty may end up giving foreigners access to U.S. gun-ownership records.

On that score, LaPierre, who serves as NRA executive vice president, warns that the “UN’s refusal” to remove civilian firearms and ammunition from the scope of the treaty amounts to a declaration that only governments should be gun owners.

But he revealed he was set Wednesday to tell the UN gathering that 58 U.S. senators had signed a letter saying that they would refuse to ratify any treaty that includes controls over civilian guns or ammunition.

Ratification by two-thirds of the Senate is necessary before an international treaty negotiated by the executive branch can become U.S. law. But the treaty could still go into effect elsewhere once 65 countries ratify it. Such a development could change the pattern of world arms transfers and reduce the U.S. share, which stands at about 40 percent of up to $60 billion in global deals.

The Bush administration opposed a 2006 UN General Assembly resolution launching the treaty process, but President Obama decided the U.S. would take part on condition the final agreement be reached by consensus -- thereby giving any of the 193 participating states an effective veto.

The safeguard is insufficient for opponents of the U.S. participation, not least because UN talks invariably involve compromise.

“The administration swears they have a whole bunch of red lines, and they will block consensus if anyone crosses them,” said Suchan, now a government relations consultant as senior associate with the Commonwealth Consulting Corporation in Arlington, Va.

“But the dynamics of international negotiations are that once you get 90 percent of what you seek, you say, ‘Maybe there is a way we can finesse the final 10 percent.’”

A clause permitting arms transfers solely between UN member states would allow UN member China to object to U.S. arms sales to Taiwan, a non-UN member that China considers to be a renegade province.

This would be highly problematic for the U.S. at a time when Beijing is engaged in an unprecedented arms buildup.

Another fear is that Arab or other states critical of Israel may use any treaty language on human rights standards to argue against U.S. arms transfers to the Israeli government – much in the same way they currently use the UN Human Rights Council to repeatedly condemn Israel.

Suchan said U.S. arms trade law is seen as the global “gold standard” for regulating arms transfers, but doubted many countries would be willing to raise the bar that high. Instead, the treaty that emerges is expected to set a lower global standard – which Suchan said would have the effect of reducing Washington’s ability to press for voluntary arms embargoes against rogue states.

“We might want to urge a country to not sell arms to a state whose government is particularly odious,” Suchan explained.

“But that government could then ask whether the sale is prohibited under the Arms Trade Treaty – and if it is not, they would argue they are meeting the international standard.”

U.S. gun lobby concern focuses on the emphasis the treaty places on governmental – as opposed to individual – rights to guns, LaPierre explained.

“They’re trying to impose a UN policy that gives guns to the governments – but the UN doesn’t in turn make moral judgments as to whether these governments are good or bad,” he said.

“If you’re the government, you get the guns, if you’re a civilian, you don’t. But this will just end up helping evil governments and tyrants.”

For LaPierre, the emphasis he sees at the UN on governmental rights reflects what he believes is a wider international tradition that contrasts with the historical American emphasis on individual rights.

“The UN view is that governments – not individual citizens – ought to protect people,” he said, signaling that this principle permeates the draft that negotiators are currently working with.

LaPierre says the treaty that is likely to emerge will have the effect of squeezing individual gun owners in the United States and elsewhere by imposing on them an onerous collection of regulations.

“If they get this through, then what comes along is the institutionalizing of the whole gun control-ban movement within the bureaucracy of UN – with a permanent funding mechanism that we [in America] will be mainly paying for,” he said.

“The world’s worst human rights abusers will end up voting for this, while the Obama administration has not drawn a line in the sand like the previous administration did. Instead, it is trying to be a part of this train wreck because they think they can somehow finesse it. But, to me, there is no finessing the individual freedoms of American citizens.”

Steven Edwards is a UN-based freelance journalist

ABOUT YOUR GUEST, BOB BEAUPREZ (pronounced BO-pray):

Bob Beauprez is a former dairy farmer, community banker and member of Congress who has spent his entire life working to leave Colorado a little better than he found it.

He was born and raised on a third generation family farm in Lafayette, Colorado. Bob's grandfather emigrated from Belgium in 1907 and founded a general livestock farm specializing in draft horses. Bob's father took over the farm and developed a nationally renowned Hereford beef cattle breeding herd and transitioned to dairy cattle in the 1950s.

The daily regime of chores, fieldwork and milkings taught Bob a disciplined work ethic that would serve him well throughout his life.

After graduating from the University of Colorado in 1970, he went into partnership with his parents and brother, Mike, in the family farming operation. He managed the dairy herd, eventually marketing their cattle throughout the United States with cattle on every continent except Australia. During that time, Bob pioneered the use of embryo transplant technology to increase the quality and marketability of the family herd. He also served eight years on the National Holstein Association Board of Directors, including five years as Chairman of the Genetic Advancement Committee. He later also became an industry spokesperson and international judge of Holstein cattle.

The dairy herd was dispersed in 1990 and Bob managed the development of the real estate for his family, eventually becoming part of a 1,500-unit residential golf course community. At the same time, Bob and his wife, Claudia, purchased controlling interest in a small community bank. As President, CEO and Chairman, Bob expanded the bank from one to 13 locations and grew its assets from $4 million to more than $400 million in twelve years.

Bob served as President of the Colorado Independent Bankers Association and was on the Board of the Independent Bankers of America.

While running the bank Bob was politically active as the chairman of the Boulder County Republican Party, and later as Colorado State GOP Chairman. He retired from the bank to run for the new 7th Congressional District in 2002, winning the nation’s closest Congressional election that year by 121 votes. After one term, in 2004, he was reelected by more than 30,000 votes.

While in Congress, Bob served on the Ways and Means, Transportation, Veterans Affairs and Small Business Committees. He was also Vice-Chairman of the Highways and Infrastructure Subcommittee and a member of the Republican Leadership Whip Team.

In 2006, he was the Republican nominee for Governor in Colorado. Since 2007, Bob has published a monthly e-magazine called A Line of Sight (http://www.alineofsight.com/), a public policy and opinion resource on current political issues. Then, in 2009, he authored his first book: A Return to Values: A Conservative Look at His Party.

Bob married his high school sweetheart, Claudia, in 1970. They have three sons and one daughter, as well as three grandchildren. Bob and Claudia have returned to their agricultural roots recently by purchasing a ranch in the Colorado Mountains near the Wyoming border. They are developing a buffalo-breeding herd in partnership with their son, Jim. Bob continues to stay politically active, guest hosting on various radio talk shows, doing numerous media interviews nationally, and maintains a busy public speaking schedul

New Revelation that AG Eric Holder Is Protecting JPMorgan Chase NYC From Criminal Investigation

New Revelation that AG Eric Holder Is Protecting JPMorgan Chase NYC From Criminal Investigation

MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
awallstProviding additional evidence that the Obama Administration's Department of Justice (DOJ) is protecting "banks too big to fail," Pulitzer Prize winning financial reporter David Cay Johnston has revealed that the DOJ has refused to force JPMorgan Chase to comply with an ongoing investigation into the bank's possible knowledge of Bernard Madoff's fraud scheme of a few years ago.
The information obtained might reveal that the bank chose to financially benefit from criminal activity:
Bernard Madoff’s principal bank, JPMorgan Chase, has for years obstructed federal bank examiners trying to ascertain what it knew about his gigantic Ponzi scheme, an official document obtained by Newsweek shows.
The Justice Department refused in September to back up Treasury inspector general staff who wanted a  court order to enforce a subpoena, in effect shielding JPMorgan from law enforcement, the October 8 document shows.
The Justice Department told the Treasury Inspector General “that they were denying the request for enforcement of the subpoena,” which means officials “could not undertake further actions regarding this matter,” wrote Jason J. Metrick, the inspector general special-agent-in-charge.
Johnston disclosed the latest damning indication of the DOJ shielding Wall Street banks that dominate US finanes in a Newsweek article. The DOJ pattern of not exploring potential big bank criminal activity was admitted to by Attorney General Eric Holder -- as BuzzFlash at Truthout reported at the time -- as recalled by Johnston:
Last March Attorney General Eric Holder told a Senate hearing he was afraid to prosecute the Too Big to Fail Banks, as it could do even more economic damage, in effect declaring them Too Big to Prosecute.
“The size of some of these institutions becomes so large that it does become difficult for us to prosecute them when we are hit with indications that if you do prosecute, if you do bring a criminal charge, it will have a negative impact on the national economy -- perhaps even the world economy," Holder testified.
Although Madoff has been serving an effective life sentence in prison since 2009, a special Treasury Department inspector general with independent powers is still trying to ascertain if JPMorgan Chase turned a blind eye to Madoff's mega-ponzi scheme that left many individuals and organizations (including charities) with enormous losses.
The bottom line of the Obama DOJ's position is that Americans are left vulnerable to criminal bank activity on a massive scale because if they were held accountable, Holder believes, the US economic system would be hurt.
But the 2007-2008 crash showed what such uninvestigated and unprosecuted behavior leads to.
In short, the chief law enforcement officer of the United States is authorizing our largest banks to engage in criminal behavior because, he claims, preventing them from doing so might negatively impact our economy? But hasn't it prima facie been proven again and again that the likely criminal bank activity undermines our financial system?
This is so nonsensical, such a defilement of justice and economic integrity that there must be another answer to Holder's protection of suspected (and as indicated in civil and other suits) criminal actions on Wall Street.
The financial masters of the universe call the shots in DC.  Holder and his law firm base, Covington and Burling, represent many of them -- and Congress and the White House are beholden to them for campaign cash and revolving door jobs.